Swimming with humpback whales moved me far beyond my expectations and was humbling in a wonderful way.
If you are choosing to go to marine parks for the sake of "education and awareness" for your kids, make sure your education includes making your kids aware of what it costs those animals to be there in those tanks.
Blackfish and The Cove aren't what save whales and dolphins; people deciding to change their behavior after becoming aware of the whole picture is where salvation lies.
I personally don't think you'd be able to contribute such captivity once you witness whales free in the ocean and with their families.
A few moments of WiFi left before heading out on the ocean with the Rodney Fox team where I'll be continuing to ask the tough questions plaguing the existence of sharks. But for at least this week you can enjoy some funny outtakes and crazy moments from the last several years of shark filming. Enjoy!
What side do you fall on and how to you justify your feeling?
"The Mentality of the Cull" is the proper title to this episode and I don't care for the thumbnail for the video either, but I gave up a bit of control on that to reach more viewers via AnimalBytesTV, and I'm thankful that they want to spread the truth about sharks rather than the same old sensationalist crap on Discovery Channel.
Part 2 of the WA Shark Cull asks how financially, environmentally, scientificly, and sensibly flawed decisions by the government continue to happen.
I took a punch for sharks, but you can modify the challenge any way you want to just as long as you share and / or donate
Brave crew heads into dark waters
Many divers in this episode showed a lack of awareness of their surroundings. If sharks wanted to kill us, in theory, each of those divers should have died.
If you are a surfer, how many times have you seen a shark swim past you without harming you? Prior to this video, had you considered that the shark might be trying to communicate through body language?
I preach enough in the video, so instead I offer these questions for you to consider while watching the video:
Do you think shutting down fishing at the Manhattan Beach Pier is good? Is it fair?
How much responsibility are we willing to take for our behavior contributing to positive or negative results with animals in the wild?
Did you know sharks are usually more afraid of you then you are of them?
How long did it take you to spot the great white sharks when they swam deep, using their counter-shading to blend in, compared to when they were in shallower water on exposing their sides and belly?
Obvious, yet overlooked. Ocean Ramsey points out that sharks can't bark or growl; they use body language.
One of the many interviewees of The Price of Existence series (launching next month) Chris Fallows shares some words of wisdom for when we are faced with adversity.
I've been asked repeatedly to release my entire conversation with the shark cull contractor in the south of Western Australia so here it is (and it's long). Whether you agree with the cull or not, this conversation offers a unique platform to analyze the cull. It's pretty clear from watching the video that Graeme Pateman is a likable guy even if you don't like how he makes his money. For the record, despite my personal opinion, I was very nice during this interview, in fact, I barely had to open my mouth...Graeme just kept talking. So much so that I had to break this interview into multiple parts. I have not cut out or changed any of his or my words, but I have inserted topical footage from my time.
Graeme is correct when he says makos, black tip whalers, etc. are not protected in Western Australia (the full list of protected fish can be seen here). All species of hammerhead sharks are listed as either endangered or vulnerable on the IUCN red list, but that is not the same as being protected in state or federal waters, which they are neither in WA.
Part 1 primarily caused me to think about the press releases prior to the cull in which the Government said they were taking careful measures to make sure the mitigation was carried out in as humane and professional manner as possible. That just doesn't seem to be the case, nor does it seem to be financially efficient as you'll see in part 2.
Part 2, among other topics, discusses the payment of the cull contractor. The press released the number $5705, based upon the estimated total amount to be spent on the contractor in the south alone over the trial period. Graeme told me $5000 per day in the interview. When I double checked on that he explained that it was actually $5500, however, this number subtracts Goods and Service Tax. Calculate the total however you feel comfortable, but I usually don't get to claim that my income is less than it is because of taxes. One young deck hand, fuel for two runs a day, and bait ( which was not always changed as I witnessed with my own eyes ) seems like rather minimal expenses. So, debate all you want whether his profit range was $4,000 a day, $5,000 a day, or somewhere in-between, whichever total you come to is an obscene amount of money.
Something else I can't shake from this interview is the fact that it was a trial run during a period of time that white sharks are known to not frequent the ares. Simultaneously the WA Government stated they wanted the drum lines in the water as soon as possible for public safety. So was it for public safety or was it to conduct a trial run?
Perhaps the most common theme throughout all my interviews with pro-cullers across Australia was the phrase "something had to be done" and the government was "doing what it could to increase human beach safety". Delivered by itself, the phrase "doing what we can to increase human safety" sounds great. The problem is the evident lack of understanding or rationale when you ask these people to explain what the cull is, how it works, how it makes the beaches safer, and why they feel safer with drum lines in the water. While actual rationale was missing from these explanations the conversations also had something else in common; the words "feeling better". So, animals were killed to for a placebo effect...what was actually accomplished was a calming of fear buzzing in the brains. Whether you love sharks or hate sharks, perhaps the first step is realizing this is a battle with ourselves rather than a battle with the sharks before we can even touch the topic of whether it is right to kill other animals in their own homes.
Well done; these guys did a nice bit of editing, I'll give 'em that much, enough that I am not 100% it's fake, but here's the evidence I think it is. I used to work for a tourist company filming at the Farallon Islands and I quickly had to learn how to blend in my footage from South Africa to match with the murky waters of the Farallones so it appeared as though these tourists enjoyed spotting great white sharks from their view in the cage (all for their souvenir DVDs) Yes, I'm saying I have faked footage and yes I'm saying that 95% of the time you DO NOT see white sharks on cage-diving trips to the Farallones so consider yourselves warned before you shell out the $900.
Anyway, heres' why I think this video is fake.
By the way, I'm releasing footage of myself "fending off a white shark" to the networks next week to prove that journalists will publish anything shark related without investigating it.